2016 totally dating site algeria
If you really need convincing, suggest re-implementing segregation, or how about slavery? In America, it will get you fired from your job and ostracized by nearly everyone.
Depending on how loudly you do it, people may picket your house, or throw things at you, or commit violence against you which is then excused by the judiciary because obviously they were provoked.
Reaction isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s not suggesting there’s a secret campaign for organized repression.
To steal an example from the other side of the aisle, it’s positing something more like patriarchy.
– * – * – * – No One Expects The Spanish Inquisition, Especially Not In 21st Century America People in ancient societies thought their societies were obviously great.
This is the post where I argue that modern society is rotten to the core, and that the only reasonable solution is to dig up King James II, clone him, and give the clone absolute control over everything.I started reading a little about Reaction after incessantly being sent links to various Mencius Moldbug posts, and then started hanging out in an IRC channel with a few Reactionaries (including the infamous Konkvistador) whom I could question about it.Obviously this makes me the world expert who is completely qualified to embark on the hitherto unattempted project of explaining it to everyone else. But the fact is, I’ve been itching to prsent an argument against Reactionary thought for a long time, but have been faced with the dual problem of not really having a solid target and worrying that everyone not a Reactionary would think I was wasting my time even talking to them.Patriarchy doesn’t have an actual Patriarch coordinating men in their efforts to keep down women.It’s just that when lots of people share some really strong cultural norms, they manage to self-organize into a kind of immune system for rejecting new ideas.Despite the iconic image of the dissident sent to Siberia, this is how the Soviets dealt with most of their iconoclasts too.If you absolutely insist on imprisonment, you can always go to Europe, where there are more than enough “hate speech” laws on the book to satisfy your wishes.But if you do read it and accuse me of holding these ideas myself and get really angry, then you fail at reading comprehension forever.I originally planned to follow this up tomorrow with the post containing my arguments against these positions, but this argument took longer than I thought to write and I expect the counterargument will as well.Trying to sum up their ideas seems like a good way to first of all get a reference point for what their ideas are, and second of all to make it clearer why I think they deserve a rebuttal.We’ll start with the meta-level question of how confident we should be that our society is better than its predecessors in important ways.